Thursday, January 14, 2010 - A new foundation Is being laid for at New America. Those who truly understand this new foundation have hidden it in the 2000-plus pages of the Health Care bill being re-written in Washington D.C. Here's something you need to know about that new foundation.

The President's first choice for Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle. After losing his re-election bid in 2004, Mr. Daschle wrote a book about his view of the condition of healthcare in America and his desire to see it improved. The book is titled "Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis".

In the book, Daschle argues for a single-payer (government controlled) healthcare system. Daschle concedes that pushing for a single-payer system in the United States would be politically problematic and that it would indeed result in socialized medicine. On March 3, 2008 Daschle said in a Huffington Post article, "I have proposed a Federal Health Board that would be a foundation from which we could address all" healthcare problems.

About a year ago, Tom Daschle had to remove his name from consideration for the HHS post because of reports of inappropriate financial dealings and tax issues. The President then selected Kathleen Sebelius to head the HHS, but the administration was still committed to the blueprint found in Tom Daschle's book - a single-payer system with a Federal Health Board that controls it all.

In the current House Bill H.R. 3962, Section 241 (a) it reads: "There is hereby established, as an independent agency in the executive branch of the Government, a Health Choices Administration". The newly created Health Choices Administration is responsible for "the establishment of qualified health benefits plan standards under this title, including the enforcement of such standards".

This is the "foundation" that Tom Daschle was talking about. In his book, Daschle states that this board should be modeled after other nations like Great Britain. "In Great Britain, for example, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which is part of the National Health Service (NHS), is the single entity responsible for providing guidance on the use of new and existing drugs, treatments, and procedures." So how does it work in Great Britain?

Let's look at the explanation found on the website for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE):

With the rapid advances in modern medicine, most people accept that no publicly funded healthcare system, including the NHS, can possibly pay for every new medical treatment which becomes available. The enormous costs involved mean that choices have to be made.

It makes sense to focus on treatments that improve the quality and/or length of someone’s life and, at the same time, are an effective use of NHS resources . . .

To ensure our judgments are fair, we use a standard and internationally recognized method to compare different drugs and measure their clinical effectiveness: the quality-adjusted life years measurement (the ‘QALY’) . . .

A QALY gives an idea of how many extra months or years of life of a reasonable quality a person might gain as a result of treatment (particularly important when considering treatments for chronic conditions) . . .

Generally, however, if a treatment costs more than [$32,290 to $48,435] per QALY, then it would not be considered cost effective.

In other words, medical treatment under the proposed healthcare system will come down to a mathematical equation based on cost effectiveness and an arbitrary judgment on your anticipated quality of life and how many years you have left.

Why should you care?

Regardless of what the "talking-heads" say on television, the final decision on your health care choices will be made by the Health Choices Administration. That decision will be a cost-based decision (i.e. is it worth the cost for the United States Government to approve payment for this treatment?). The question for you is, is the proposed healthcare system worth giving up your freedom to make your own health care choices?

What can you do? Here are four ideas. If you have more ideas, please send them to me so that I can pass them along in future journal entries.

1. You can write or call the offices of your Senators and Congressmen and Congresswomen. Ask them to explain the Health Choices Administration and on what basis, this newly created government agency will be making decisions for you.

And don't stop with just one phone call and one letter or email. Contact your representatives weekly or twice a month. At the very least, your representative will know that you are watching.

2. You can pass this journal entry on. It is the first of many. Hopefully it will educate and stimulate a good and noble people to action; the very same people described in the constitution as "We the People . . ." You are free to make copies and distribute them by hand or 'snail-mail.' Please make sure that the last paragraph of this journal is included with your copies so that individuals can contact me with comments or questions.

If you forward this in e-mail form, please remove the "FW:" from the subject line. Many people delete Email Forwards without even opening them up. Also, take the time to e-mail it to one or two individuals at a time. You are encouraged to send this to everyone in your contact list, but many spam filters block emails that contain too many addresses in the "To:" box.

3. Organize a trip to your representative's office (local or in Washington D.C.). By carpooling you can share the expense while making a stronger impact by arriving in greater numbers. By the way, if you haven't done so already, you should make at least one trip to D.C. in your lifetime. Go to the memorials; read the inscriptions on the walls; examine the statues and paintings. You will discover a strong Godly heritage, clearly on display and quite possibly forgotten by your representative.

4. If you are a person of faith, pray. Pray fervently for your nation and for her leaders. Pray daily or hourly. Pray for a good and noble people to wake up and take action. Pray also for those who wish to reshape America in a Progressive image - pray for their safety and protection, but pray that their efforts will be thwarted.

My name is Curtis Ferrell, and this is An American Journal In The 21^st Century. You can find additional journal entries at http://clfnotes.blogspot.com. You can contact me at American_Journal@sbcglobal.net. If you do not wish to receive these journal postings, please email me so that I can remove you from my contact list or click here: Remove

Just four months ago I wrote these words: "The Bible speaks very clearly about the sanctity of life; about our responsibility to the poor, the orphaned and the widow; about God's view of homosexual behavior. The church needs to rediscover the authority found in the Word of God and stand on it. However, that kind of stance could become something more than politically incorrect, it could become illegal. The U.S. Senate is considering a Hate Crimes Bill (S.909) which could be used to prosecute ministers for declaring God's truth on homosexuality."

As I write this article, the President of the United States is set to sign the Defense Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2010. Hidden in this bill, which will fund our troops around the world for the coming year, is an amendment which couldn't pass the House of Representatives on its own merit. A handful of legislators from the U.S. House and the Senate quietly included the Senate Hate Crimes Bill as an amendment to the Defense bill during the development of a conference report that was supposed to merge two different versions of the Defense bill, one from the House and one from the Senate.

When that merged bill is signed, it will establish restrictions in U.S. law preventing certain kinds of speech. At that point every Christ-follower, including and maybe especially pastors, priests, and ministers, will have to determine if they are willing to risk prosecution and jail time to proclaim the whole truth found in scripture.

Many will be tempted to ignore the topic of homosexuality and what the Bible has to say about it. If you don't talk about it you cannot be arrested and charged.

Others will be tempted to deny the authority of the Word of God so that they can pick and choose which verses they like and which verses they don't like.

You may be thinking, "Curt, you are crazy! It would never come to that!" Let me tell you what is happening around the world, where speech has been limited with recent hate crimes legislation.

In the Netherlands, film maker Geert Wilders will stand trial on January 20^th, 2010 for true statements that he included in a film he produced that is offensive to Muslims.

In June 2001, A Canadian man was found guilty of hate speech, when he advertised bumper-stickers he was selling which depicted the outline of two men holding hands inside a red circle with a slash through it. Next to this image was an equal sign and four bible references: Romans 1, Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10. As a result of this court decision, the nation of Canada has found that these four scripture passages constitute hate speech, and to affirm them as true is to commit an act of hate speech, punishable by law.

In the United States we see other efforts to curb biblically-centered speech. Colleges and universities, long thought to be bastions of free thought and free expression, have increasingly established hate speech codes to protect students from racial, sexual, and other forms of harassment. In 2004 the Colorado Supreme Court upheld a ruling in a custody case which required Cheryl Clark to protect her daughter by making sure "that there is nothing in the religious upbringing or teaching that the minor child is exposed to that can be considered homophobic." This would include the first chapter of the book of Romans. A high school in the U.S., while approving the Day of Silence, which promotes a homosexual lifestyle, tried to deny the observance of the Day of Truth, which tried to counter the ideas promoted in the Day of Silence.

Through the decades of this experiment called the United States of America we have heard voices warning against limiting free expression and free speech. Political scientist Martin Gruberg said that we, "should confront offensive ideas by rebuttal, not by suppression." Ben Franklin stated “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech." And consider this statement from President Harry S. Truman: "When even one "American" -- who has done nothing wrong -- is forced by fear to shut his mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in peril."

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The idea that speech should be free from constraint is not universal. We see this in a response during the investigation into the Canadian ruling to outlaw the four offensive scripture passages. When asked, "What value do you give freedom of speech when you investigate one of these complaints?" Investigator Richard Steacy said, "Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don't give it any value."

Actually it is a biblical value, the first chapter of the Old Testament Book of Isaiah contains these words: Stop doing wrong, learn to do right! Seek justice, encourage the oppressed. Defend the cause of the fatherless, plead the case of the widow. "Come now, let us reason together," says the Lord. "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool."

Reasoning together requires freedom of thought and freedom of expression. These ideas, these truths, did not originate in a civil document authored by the founders of America. These ideas originated in the heart of God.

There are those who try to say that this bill will not be used to attack religious expression, and can only be activated if someone commits a felony and says that he or she was encouraged or enticed to commit the crime based on "hate speech" statements. These are the same people that assured us that abortion on demand would never happen in America and euthanasia (mercy killing or assisted suicide) could never be seriously considered in such a civilized society.

What can you do? Encourage your spiritual leaders to boldly preach the Word of God without fear or hesitation. Defend the authority of scripture. Pray for the church in America. Love and pray for those who disagree with the truth found in scripture. Support politicians who value freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Encourage the appointments of judges who value freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Prepare yourself to boldly face the consequences of the words you speak or write.

Someday, we will be reading the report of an individual being charged under this new law for simply speaking his or her mind and defending biblical truth. It could be your pastor. It could be me. It could be you. We were warned and failed to do enough to defend the right to freedom of speech. Someday, someone will have to fight to win it back.

During the Trojan War between the forces of Greece and Troy a tale of cunning strategy is told. After a long, ineffective siege on the city of Troy, the Greek army built a large empty horse and left it as a gift to the people of Troy. The priest, Laocoön, wanted to warn the city of Troy but was strangled by the henchmen of Athena. The King's daughter, Cassandra, warned that the horse would be the downfall of Tory. Nobody listened to the warnings. We all know what happened as a result.

Eerily, there are many similarities between this tale and the current health care reform bill in the House (HR 3200).

I have tried to digest HR 3200. I have scanned the entire document and then I went back to study it (in my spare time). I've only gotten through Title 1, Subtitle E but I am beginning to see why so many people are having a hard time describing the details of this bill.

The threat to the free-market form of health care that we have now, and the real possibility of creating a single-payer system is certainly something to be concerned with. But other than the government entering the game as a major health care financier, which is really a philosophical difference in the political arena, there are no policy initiatives in this bill. HR 3200 is simply the establishment of a structure; an empty shell. Advocates can only tell us what they "hope" the bill will do, and opponents can only say what we "fear" it will do. But this is exactly where the real danger lies.

Like the Trojan horse, this empty shell will be filled with people. Most of the people filling this horse will be appointed by whoever controls the White House in any given year. These individuals will be the ones defining what Essential Benefits are and, as a result, which medical procedures are mandated in any give medical situation. This, in turn, will determine which procedures are paid for by federal tax dollars.

Who will this administration pick to fill this horse? People like Tom Daschle, Kathleen Sebelius, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, and John Holdren. These will be the policy makers for the current administration. The policies that these individuals champion are rationed health care, quality-of-life decision making, and unrestricted abortions even late in the pregnancy. These will be the frontline policy initiatives, but what policy ideas will next emerge from our Trojan horse? Genetic engineering, genetic determination of usefulness to society, population control, and diversity-weighted health care decisions have all been floated, if not promoted, by individuals in this likely pool of candidates. Who knows what else lurks inside this empty shell.

It is possible that the Athena's of today will strangle out the warnings of modern-day Laocoöns. And our fellow citizens may not listen to the warnings of the sons and daughters of the king. But the reality is that, after a long ineffective siege, a Trojan Horse has been presented to the city of Washington. We would be foolish not to learn from the lessons of history and fable.

            The current "Tea Party" organizers have resurrected many of the slogans that were popular during the American Revolution. One of the most popular is "Live Free or Die" which actually was coined after the war.

            That phrase, now the motto of New Hampshire, came from a toast by General John Stark in 1809. He was a famous Revolutionary War soldier and was unable to attend a reunion of the Battle of Bennington, so he sent his regrets with this toast: "Live free or die. Death is not the worst of evils."

            Scripture has a lot to say about freedom. In fact, God loves freedom so much that he has given us the freedom of choice. God is pro-choice! This is what he told the Israelites through Moses: This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live and that you may love the LORD your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to him. For the LORD is your life, and he will give you many years in the land he swore to give to your fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. ~ Deuteronomy 30:19-20 (NIV)

            God gives us the freedom to choose, but he expects us to make the right choice. When we fail to make the right choice there are always consequences. In the 34^th chapter of Jeremiah we read the story of the Israelites a little further down the road of history.

            Included in the instructions that Moses gave the people was the policy that, every seven years, the Jews were supposed to free anyone who had sold themselves into slavery; a Sabbath Year. For decades the people of God failed to observe this practice and continued to force people, those who had sold themselves into slavery, to remain in slavery.

            Jeremiah recounts the story of King Zedekiah and how he made a covenant, or a sacred promise, with the people to obey God's directions about the Sabbath Year and setting the captives free. But as the years rolled by, they changed their minds and re-enslaved the people they had promised to free. God was not happy!

            "Therefore, this is what the LORD says: You have not obeyed me; you have not proclaimed freedom for your fellow countrymen. So I now proclaim 'freedom' for you, declares the LORD--'freedom' to fall by the sword, plague and famine. I will make you abhorrent to all the kingdoms of the earth."

            God gives us freedom of choice, but he expects us to choose life, to choose justice, to choose integrity, to choose freedom. When we fail to choose correctly, we will suffer the consequences. No nation or people, no matter how great, can choose to ignore God's law, his desire for people to live free, and expect to escape the consequences.

            Paul, the apostle, wrote to the church in Galatia and challenged them, "It is for freedom that Christ has set you free!" In other words, You've been given this great gift, so use it! He could say the same thing to the church in America.

            Barna Research has found that evangelical Christians were the least likely demographic to contact their Congressmen and Senators. You've been given this great gift, so use it!

            The Constitution has given us the freedom of speech and expression, the freedom to practice our faith as we choose, the freedom of assembly, and yet these rights are being eroded almost daily. A pastor in California has just been told that he cannot have a bible study in his home without a special permit from the county. A Catholic church in Connecticut has been threatened with a fine for using its web site to encourage parishioners to call their Congressmen and Senators. PBS has announced that they will no longer allow any new religious content on their stations. You've been given this great gift, so use it!

            Benjamin Franklin said, "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." Many in the American church have traded their religious freedom, not for security, but for a life without controversy. You've been given this great gift, so use it!

            General John Stark and the original Tea Partiers may not even recognize the Americans that are found in many churches today.

            Hear their cry, "Live Free or Die!"

            Better yet, hear the call of Christ, "Die to yourself so that you can truly live free!"